”En del av arbetet handlar om jämn könsfördelning. Eftersom könsmaktsordningen är till fördel för män som grupp innebär detta att mäns underrepresentation inom en kategori inte har samma strukturella innebörd som kvinnors underrepresentation. Det är därför viktigt att uppmärksamma att en ojämn könsfördelning har olika innebörd beroende på hur makt- och statusrelationerna ser ut mellan olika utbildningar, vilket i sin tur har samband med kön.Suomennettuna: Jos miehet ovat aliedustettuina jossakin, asialle ei tarvitse tehdä mitään, koska miehillä ryhmänä on rakenteellinen valtaetu yhteiskunnassa.
Britain is no longer split by class. Instead the social chasm is between taxpayers and the public sector
Seven Ideas You Can Never Discuss on Television
6. WOMEN AREN’T TOTALLY INNOCENT AND HELPLESS."Uppsala University must close" (Google käännös)
Although there isn’t a person alive who hasn’t met a despicable woman, it remains heretical to imply that women may possibly be human beings, and as such, they may be capable of acting with willful malice toward others. Despite the fact that nearly every sociological study of family violence ever conducted has concluded that women hit men at least as frequently as the inverse, “domestic violence” is still viewed as an exclusively male-on-female phenomenon. But who needs muscles when you have WMDs such as societal prejudice and the law squarely on your side? In her book When She Was Bad, author Patricia Pearson argued that until puberty, boys and girls both express aggression physically. Around age 12 women turn to more sophisticated tactics for intentionally inflicting harm: gossip, shaming, and false accusations. It’s like on Seinfeld where Elaine explains that instead of giving one another wedgies, girls tease each other until they develop eating disorders. False rape charges, as well as phony claims of domestic abuse and sexual harassment, have become commonplace. The double standard is so lopsided, female spousal abusers are even permitted to become Secretary of State without it ever becoming an issue in their vetting process.
Professor Bo Rothstein: The heads of Uppsala University does not respect the fundamental principles necessary for the university to qualify as a university. The Vice-Chancellor Anders Hallberg and others responsible at Uppsala University to respect or understand the principle of educational freedom. Instead, they have to look for patterns that are normal in the commercial and political activities. Thus, the university disqualified itself as a university.
The second case deals with sociology professor Eva Lundgren. After she was on Swedish Television in May 2005 stated that 100's of children in Sweden ritually murdered in sexual orgies, the University decided to initiate a review of her research to see whether irregularities existed which could cause a notification to the Council. This review resulted in widespread criticism and of course you could not find evidence of allegations of child murders. Eva Lundgren had, for example, argues that her research had evidence that almost half (47 percent) of all women in Sweden are subjected to violence by their male partners and that there is no difference between the men who use violence against their female partners and those who do so. The audit found that this completely unfounded.
It also showed that her main thesis, that there are no differences between men who use violence and those who do so, had no support. But it is actually worse than that: the reviewers' analysis of Lundgren's own data showed that "the conclusion should be just the opposite. The risk is significantly higher that some groups of women exposing their husbands to violence." Lundgren's own data showed that the risk of violence is significantly higher for women whose partner is unemployed, was not born in Sweden or are drug addicts, but that she had not reported.
Management has also expressed its "full confidence" for her and also given her extraordinary good working! Skälet är med stor sannolikhet att Lundgrens teser har visat sig ha stort politiskt stöd och ofta använts av ledande politiker som argument. The reason is most likely to Lundgren's theses have been shown to have broad political support and often used by leading politicians as an argument.